Commentary: Whose Views Count in Evidence Synthesis? And When Do They Count?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Whose interests count?
Whose interests should count and how should various interests be balanced at the pediatric patient's bedside? The interests of the child patient clearly count. Recently, however, many authors have argued that the family's interests also count. But how should we think about the interests of others? What does it mean to talk about "the family" in this context? Does it really just mean the interes...
متن کاملDo all fragments count?
We aim at finding the minimal set of fragments which achieves maximal parse accuracy in Data Oriented Parsing (DOP). Experiments with the Penn Wall Street Journal (WSJ) treebank show that counts of almost arbitrary fragments within parse trees are important, leading to improved parse accuracy over previous models tested on this treebank. We isolate a number of dependency relations which previou...
متن کاملAnnulonemertes (phylum Nemertea): when segments do not count
We estimated the phylogenetic position of the pseudosegmented ribbon worm Annulonemertes minusculus to test proposed evolutionary hypotheses to explain these body constrictions. The analysis is based on 18S rDNA sequences and shows that the species belongs to an apomorphic clade of hoplonemertean species. The segmentation has no phylogenetic bearing as previously discussed, but is a derived cha...
متن کاملPlants do not count… or do they? New perspectives on the universality of senescence
1. Senescence, the physiological decline that results in decreasing survival and/or reproduction with age, remains one of the most perplexing topics in biology. Most theories explaining the evolution of senescence (i.e. antagonistic pleiotropy, accumulation of mutations, disposable soma) were developed decades ago. Even though these theories have implicitly focused on unitary animals, they have...
متن کاملLexical Nouns are Both + mass and + count , but they are Neither + mass nor + count
This chapter investigates the rationale for having the lexical categories or features mass and count. Some theories make the features be syntactic; others make them be semantic. It is concluded here that none of the standard accounts of their function actually serve the purpose for which they are adopted, and that we should instead remove these features from the lexicon and have lexical nouns b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Healthcare Policy | Politiques de Santé
سال: 2006
ISSN: 1715-6580
DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2006.17876